Lending Club vs. Prosper – Which Is Better?

Investors looking to take advantage of the great returns offered by peer to peer lending have two choices: Lending Club or Prosper.

Both offer excellent potential returns for investors, but they do operate slightly differently. Let’s battle it out with Lending vs. Prosper – Which would you rather invest with? What follows is a guide that will help investors understand the differences between these two companies.


Prosper (see my Prosper review) was the first p2p lending company and launched in February 2006. This was during the debt bubble of the 2000’s, and they quickly gained a large number of investors and borrowers.

Lending Club launched eighteen months later in mid 2007 on Facebook originally. Today both remain the only two real choices for peer-to-peer investors.


In my opinion, one of the more important metrics is the investing returns of each. Which can you get better returns from?

For Prosper they’ve changed their risk model and underwriting in July 2009. They became much more like Lending Club. Without question, previous performance with Prosper was poor and would have been a terrible choice to invest with.

Statistics are courtesy of LendStats.com. Data is accurate as of September 2014. This chart is collectively all outstanding loans at each lender, and breaks-down performance for each year.

YearProsperLending Club

The results from are somewhat surprising to me. Prosper edged out Lending Club for approximately four years. While that’s not the complete picture of returns, it’s interesting that Prosper shows you would more than likely get better returns.

State Availability

The first thing for p2p investors to consider is whether or not P2P lending is available in their state. Even though both Lending Club and Prosper are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), it is still up to the individual states whether or not to allow these companies to solicit for investors in their state.

Lending Club

Lending Club is available to new investors in the following states: California*, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Nevada, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Wyoming (California and Kentucky have additional requirements for new investors).

However, there is an additional list of states available for investors via the Lending Club trading platform FolioFN. This is where investors trade in existing loans and this has a much broader acceptance with the states. The additional states available here are: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas.


Prosper has a slightly different list of states available for new investors:
Alaska, California*, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire*, New York, Oregon*, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia*, Washington*, Wisconsin and Wyoming (there are additional requirements for those states marked with an asterisk). Prosper does not allow any additional states on their trading platform.

Interest Rates Comparison

The interest rates charged to borrowers change regularly, but as of this writing, Lending Club interest rates range from 6.03% up to 24.11%. It is a somewhat complex formula that takes into account various factors that appear on a borrower’s credit report such as FICO score, number of recent credit inquiries, length of credit history, total number of open credit accounts and revolving credit to name a few. Most borrowers will also end up paying a higher interest rate the higher the loan amount and for 60 month loan terms versus 36 months.

Prosper has slightly higher rates and also allows borrowers with lower credit scores on to their platform. Their interest rates range from a low 5.65% up to 31.99%. Prosper offers 12-month loan terms which carry the lowest rates, and they also allow borrowers with a slightly lower credit score than Lending Club and these people typically pay the highest rates. There is no public information as to how Prosper calculates their interest rates, but we do know that they take into account credit data such as number of inquiries, available credit, credit card utilization, and recent delinquencies.

The Investment Platform

Prosper and Lending Club both allow investors to invest in a minimum of $25 per note, but Prosper does give a little more flexibility here. With Lending Club you must invest in multiples of $25 whereas Prosper allows any amount of at least $25. The minimum needed to open an account is just $25 with either company.

Semi-Automated Investing

Both companies will help take the legwork out of investing for you. At any one time there are hundreds of loans available for investors on either platform. But investors wanting just a broad cross section of loans can invest their available cash in just a few clicks.

Lending Club always provides three options when you invest in this semi-automated way: High, Medium and Low risk loans. Enter the amount you want to invest (or just let them invest your available cash) and just a couple of clicks later you are done.

Prosper has a Quick Invest feature that allows investors to put new money to work very quickly. With Quick Invest you can choose the loan grade or other filtering criteria, and you can invest any amount greater than $25 in just four clicks.

For those investors who like p2p lending but don’t want to manage their investments at all there are “managed account” options at both companies. Lending Club PRIME has a minimum investment of $5,000 and is subject to a one-time 0.8% fee. PRIME accounts are fully hands-off – the investor provides some initial direction (as in what interest rates to invest in) and then the Lending Club takes care of the rest. Prosper has something similar called their “concierge service” that starts at $25,000, but has no fee attached to it.

Manual Investing

If you like looking at individual loans then both companies allow fully manual investing. You can filter the loans on the platform according to interest rate, loan term, loan purpose as well as a whole range of date pulled from borrower’s credit reports.

Lending Club allows the added benefit of being able to download the spreadsheet of all available loans on the platform, and then you can do analysis on these loans in Excel. Prosper doesn’t allow a download, but it does have superior filtering capability on their platform. One little trick for Prosper investors: if you use Google Chrome you can get a plugin called Prosperity that will display the credit data for each loan on the page (as long as you are logged in to your Prosper account). I use this feature all the time and have found it to be very helpful.

Credit Worthy Borrowers and Default Rates

Both companies have strict underwriting standards and a borrower must have decent credit before obtaining a loan from either company. Lending Club uses Transunion to pull credit data, and they allow borrowers with a minimum credit score of 660. Prosper uses the Experian Scorex credit score and allows borrowers with a minimum credit score of 640 (this minimum score is reduced to 600 for borrowers taking out a second loan).

Defaults are a big concern for every p2p investor. When comparing the defaults from all loans that originated in 2010, we can see that Lending Club has a slightly lower default rate (as of this writing) of 3.2% versus at Prosper 5.7% (data from Lendstats.com). This doesn’t mean that returns are lower at Prosper than Lending Club; it just means that Prosper has on average higher risk (and higher return) loans. This is demonstrated by the average interest rate for 2010 loans. It was 12.2% at Lending Club versus 19.2% at Prosper.

Which Company is Right For You?

I am not going to make a recommendation between Lending Club or Prosper.

I originally just started with Lending Club and was hesitant to invest with Prosper based upon previous performance. As I discuss in my Prosper review, the’ve made dramatic changes in their underwriting process. From the statistics Prosper offers similar, if not slightly better, performance and risk profile to Lending Club.

I now have accounts at both companies, and I continue to add new money to my investments there. I encourage every peer-to-peer investor to research each company, take a look at their platforms and get a feel for which one you prefer.

New investors should also take a look at the prospectuses of both Lending Club and Prosper, you should always know the risks involved. Also the entire loan history for both companies is available for download online.

My opinion is that new investors have two great choices. If you can’t decide between the two companies, then do what I did – open up accounts at both companies.

Make a Comment

Your Email address will not be published.


Notify me of followup comments via Email. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Reader Comments

  1. Damien says

    I’ve had accounts at both for a couple years. My observation is that I NEVER had any issue with a note on Prosper. Not one single default, maybe a couple of payments within grace period (few days late), that’s about it. Works like a charm. And I targeted the highest interest rate notes (nothing under 15%), which means that I am, to date, able to generate over 18% ROI with Prosper, which is awesome.
    The main downside, is that recently (in the past year) and all of a sudden, they stopped having high interest notes available (to the general public at least) and started having way fewer notes available in general. As a result, I rarely buy new notes on Prosper, because I very, very rarely find anything that fits my investment strategy anymore.

    On the other hand, Lending Club has notes for everybody. Hundreds. Thousands. I could invest 4 times a day (they release new notes 4 times a day) even with my very picky high return selection criteria. They also have interests much higher than in Prosper. With Prosper, if you manage to find a 17% interest note, don’t let it go, grab it, it might not happen again for weeks. On LC, you find everyday notes going above 25%. BUT. Of course, there is a but. My experience with defaults and bad payers at LC has been quite worrying. Over 2% of the notes NEVER made a payment. Default from the beginning. And I never saw the money back, not a penny of it (I wonder why LC who just gave them like 20k couldn’t just cancel the loan and get back, at least some of it? How can someone take a loan, never make a payment, and get away with it?).
    Also, late payments are common. Defaults aren’t unusual. Negotiations between LC and the borrower happen more than you think (resulting in them paying less than they were supposed to).
    As a direct result, my ROI in LC is constantly dropping, and the question of where it will end remains open. It is still above Prosper, but statistics and projections are telling me that it won’t stay there for long, and in the long run I expect it to drop from above 23% to the 12-15% range. That is still a good ROI, but 1- it is way less than Prosper, 2- it is a projection, and anything could happen and 3- it is not reassuring to see it going down everyday.
    Bottom line: if there were more notes on Prosper, I would favor Prosper. I trust their strategy way more than LC, which seems to be aiming at initiating more and more loans, checking less and less the profiles, at the expense of the investor.

    N.B: it is worth mentioning that as time goes by, LC is REMOVING investing tools. The investor gets less and less information, and they make it easier and easier on the borrower. I am sure they know what they are doing, and I even think I know what they are doing: they are shifting from the small individual investors who select carefully their notes like me trying to achieve very high returns, to the corporate investors who will inject millions in the business, and just want the guarantee of a decent return (6-8%). As a result, they favor quantity over quality. I don’t have millions, and I have time. I prefer to spend time on selection and get a 20% ROI. I am not their target customer anymore.
    If you don’t have time to manage your money and are interested in getting a 6%+ return, then you might as well join. If you want to get a 15% + ROI, I don’t know if LC or Prosper are the place anymore. I am still buying new notes here and there, but I’m actively looking for the next big thing, as ROI under 12% are not interesting to me.

  2. Glendon Thompson says

    Prosper have generally more predictive data and this have a better resource for setting interest rates and completing risk management. It not much better but marginally. They probably why you have better returns.

    I pulled down their data and designed models on both data sets. Prosper data predictors were bette on univariate and multivariate. There was however significant overlap.

    From the theory of risk based pricing ideally it doesn’t matter what the interest rate is if the risk is managed properly the return should be uniform across all classes. The issue is volatility.

    It is evident that lending club has invested a lot of effort in the last several years to improve their algorithms. The number of variables in their data set has dramatically increased but it takes time for historical data to develop. In time LC will out perform prosper in underwriting unless Prosper act to increase their predictor set.

  3. says

    I’ve been investing in LendingClub for close to a year, and everything is running smoothly.

    On the other hand, I’ve tried to invest with Prosper, but talking with their customer service reps on the phone really shook my confidence in the company. They simply were not good at answering my questions, whereas LendingClub phone reps are much more intelligent and courteous. Call both companies and you’ll see the difference. Also check out the reviews for each company on CreditKarma.com

    It seems to me that LendingClub has a much brighter future.